Yesterday Rean and I spoke in the Waco 2nd Ward sacrament meeting. We
know that some women in the church (including Rean) are somewhat uncomfortable
with Mother’s Day because they don’t feel up to the idealized persona of the
“perfect Mom.” So rather than focus on the typical Mother’s Day syrup that we
sometimes hear, we talked about the gospel. (That’s what sacrament meeting is
for, right?) Using scriptures and specific doctrines as an underpinning, Rean
spoke about seven lessons she’s learned about marriage and parenting. I spoke
about honoring our mothers by honoring our covenants, with special emphasis on
the Savior’s “Sermon on the Mount” message from Matthew in the New Testament and Third Nephi in the Book of Mormon.
On Saturday I was asked to join the stake
presidency in speaking at the bishops training meeting (also attended by
counselors, clerks, and executive secretaries). They invited me to talk about
public affairs and “anything else that the spirit may dictate.” I reported on
recent progress in the Waco Stake’s organizing its public affairs operation,
then told them about the work we’re doing to build relationships of trust with
city government, the chamber of commerce, Baylor University, and several
non-profit organizations. I told them that Alan Mayfield, the stake’s Public
Affairs Director, will soon visit the wards and branches to provide further
details on Just Serve and other public affairs initiatives.
For the “additional”
part of my message, I talked about the difference between “transactional” and
“transformational” leaders. Transactional leaders focus on meetings, reports
and other routine things. Transactional work is about administering. Transformational leadership, on the other hand, is
about ministering. It’s about inspiring people to understand that they can aspire
to and achieve higher performance. Transactional leaders make
sure the train runs on time. After that work is done, transformational
leadership ensures that the train is on the right track, headed in the right
direction, and that everyone who wants to make the journey has a ticket and is
on the train. I urged bishops to delegate as much transactional leadership (administrative duties) as possible so they can invest the lion's share of their energy in the transformational (ministering) portion of their leadership role. I ended by
telling the story of my first bishop, in the original Waco Ward, who was a
wonderful transformational leader and who inspired me (as a recent convert) to
be a tireless covenant-keeper rather than only a covenant-maker. I said my
bishop understood Section 121 of the Doctrine & Covenants
and knew that “reproving with sharpness” does not imply “harshness,” it implies
“clarity.” And he knew how to “show forth afterwards an increase of love” after
he had reproved or corrected someone. As Christians, we of course want to be kind.
But I believe some church leaders mistake lack of courage (or skill) for
kindness. Is it “kind” not to hold someone accountable when they fail to perform in the
calling with which they’ve been entrusted? Is it “kind” to say nothing and
simply release a poor performer “with a vote of thanks,” thereby implying that
the poor performance was acceptable? I think not. I will forever be grateful to
my first bishop who taught me the difference.
Judging by the
animated comments after the meeting, I’d say my message struck a chord. Two
bishops inquired about my availability to speak in their wards. (I told them
that although we are assigned to the three units that meet in the stake
building, we are available to speak anywhere in the stake.)
This past week we
got the Zone Leaders moved into a new apartment. Their new place was not quite
ready for occupancy, so they spent two nights with us. It was a pleasure having
them as our guests.
Rean coaching the Elders during this week's Zone Council meeting.
They really love her. And let's just say that when Mama Bear talks,
the Cubs listen.
|
Tuesday’s Zone
Council meeting was the best we’ve attended since being in the mission. The
missionaries here have been using the SMART Goals approach we taught them in
January. But Elder Petersen and Elder Reed took it a step further. For the
“accountability” portion of the meeting, they had the missionaries divide into
Districts. These smaller groups then applied SMART Planning to their work with investigators. This was so much more
productive that the previous accountability discussions that were sometimes
little more than a repeat of the previous meeting’s general comments like “we will get the members more involved.” The SMART Planning approach requires very
specific, measurable, and time-bound commitments on action steps in behalf of
the investigators' progress. This approach produced very animated discussion as
the missionaries challenged and coached each other to markedly improved goal
setting. Over the next few weeks, it will be interesting to track the results
of this meeting protocol.
All is well.
Write to us. We would love to hear from you.
xoxoxo
ReplyDeleteI would like to know the 7 things Mom's learned about marriage and parenting.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete